News & Reports

SFN –Daily Ag Summary
Regional Ag News 
SFN –Today's Topic
NC Ag Commissioner
SC Ag Commissioner
NC News Network  Carolina Newsmakers  USDA News & Reports



 
Ag News

NPPC ‘Puzzled’ About Pork Board Appointments

(this news story is text only)
  Program 1561 
  Posted on Fri, Jul 2, 2010


WASHINGTON, D.C.– In a letter sent to  Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, the National Pork Producers Council said it is puzzled and disappointed with the secretary’s recent appointments to the National Pork Board.

The National Pork Board, with which NPPC works closely, administers the federal checkoff program for the U.S. pork industry. The program was set up by Congress through the Pork Promotion, Research and Consumer Information Act of 1985, or Pork Act. The National Pork Board’s 15-member board, which is responsible for making checkoff funding and program decisions, is chosen by the Secretary of Agriculture based on nominations received from the Pork Act delegate body, whose members also are appointed by the secretary.

Historically the candidates eligible for service on the National Pork Board are ranked in priority order by Pork Act delegates at the annual National Pork Industry Forum, and traditionally the secretary has respected the will of the delegates.

Vilsack in early June rejected two of the top five of eight candidates, including one from North Carolina, put forth by the Pork Act delegates. There were five vacancies to fill.

“We recognize the efforts to ensure the Board reflects the vast diversity and dynamics of our industry,” said NPPC President Sam Carney in the letter to Vilsack, “but cannot understand how an entire region of the country can be overlooked, particularly since a candidate from the region was highly recommended by your own delegates.”

In the letter, NPPC pointed out that pork producers in North Carolina, the second largest pork producing state, contributed more than 10 percent of the checkoff funds in 2009.

NPPC said it would categorize Vilsack’s decision as “puzzling and disappointing to pork producers” and asked the secretary to share his perspective on the matter.

More Stories

 Jul 2  Senate Begins 2012 Farm Bill Process
  Land Use Change Theory Affected by New USDA Report
  Expect DeLauro Food Safety Bill This Month
  Disaster Assistance for Honeybee, Livestock and Farm-Raised Fish Producers
  Agreement Reached in Ohio to Keep HSUS Ballot Off November Ballot
  Easing of Cuban Trade Embargo One Step Closer
  Cotton Futures Holding Steady on Mill Buying
 Jul 1  New Trade Opportunities Good for Economy
  Animal Research Minute-Could a new pill cure jet lag?
  Cotton & Peanuts, Name of the Game in the Southeast
  Agencies to Review Food Safety
  Fertilizer 101 Initiative Announced by The Fertilizer Institute
  Hog Prices to Remain Strong, but $63 Was a Fluke
  Corn Futures Jump on NASS Acreage Report
  Gloomy Ending to Second Quarter for Wall Street
 Jun 30  USDA Provides Emergency Assistance to North Carolina Producers of Honeybees, Livestock and Farm-Raised Fish
  Economic Perspective-Efficient markets
  Animal Research Minute-Did you know an injured cat that lost its back paws in a tragic accident is able to walk again?
  FDA Wants More Guidelines for Antimicrobial Use
  Crop Estimates Due Out This Morning




 





 

Copyright 2012 – All Rights Reserved

Curtis Media Group – Southern Farm Network – www.SFNToday.com

3012 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone (919) 790-9392
email: info@SFNToday.com